Monjuvi 2021 report




Published July 2022 • 26 Pages

The 5 Key Questions Addressed by this Report:

  • How many physicians were reached by Monjuvi through reportable promotional activity in 2021 and how does this compare to its peer set in the Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma markets?
  • What promotional mix was leveraged (e.g., sales rep detailing, physician education, and paid speaking) and what was the median spend on each type of activity?
  • How does Incyte and MorphoSys’s depth of coverage vary within key specialties (e.g., Hematology/Oncology, Nursing, Physician Assistant, Medical Oncology, and Radiation Oncology) and how does this compare to its peers and the overall set of rep-accessible physicians?
  • How often are physicians receiving paid meals for Monjuvi throughout the year (e.g., monthly, quarterly, annually)?
  • Who were the most frequent meal recipients and top paid speakers for Monjuvi in 2021?

Data Sources and Methodology:

  • MDDetails leverages company-reported financial transaction data disclosed through CMS Open Payments. This data set captures all transfers of value (e.g., speaking fees, consulting fees, travel, education, and meals) made on behalf of a drug or device manufacturer to a physician. Currently, over 5 years of longitudinal data is available – covering payments to more than 1,000,000 U.S. healthcare professionals.
  • Over 8,990 paid interactions across 3,770 physicians made on behalf of Monjuvi were carefully examined to support our analysis. In addition, interaction data from 19 peer products (e.g. Adcetris, Aliqopa, Beleodaq, Brukinsa, Calquence, Folotyn, Gazyva, Imbruvica, Kymriah, Polivy, Ruxience, Tazverik, Tecartus, Truxima, Ukoniq, Venclexta, Xpovio, Yescarta, and Zynlonta ) was leveraged to provide benchmarking and market insights.